Table 1 |
||||
| Binding energies (in kJ/mol) obtained from single-trajectory analysis | ||||
| (TNFR1)2 | LT-(TNFR1)1 | LT-(TNFR1)2 | LT-(TNFR1)3 | |
| ∆HvdW | −671.6 ± 1.2 | −739.5 ± 2.2 | −600.7 ± 1.7 | −670.4 ± 1.9 |
| ∆Helect | −668.7 ± 3.5 | −676.5 ± 4.3 | −567.4 ± 4.6 | −662.8 ± 4.2 |
| ∆Gpolar | 709.3 ± 3.3 | 700.9 ± 4.0 | 589.9 ± 2.0 | 680.4 ± 1.8 |
| ∆Gapolar | −60.7 ± 0.1 | −73.4 ± 0.2 | −59.3 ± 0.1 | −66.7 ± 0.2 |
| ∆Gbinding | −691.6 ± 5.0 | −788.5 ± 6.3 | −637.5 ± 6.4 | −719.4 ± 6.2 |
The actual numbers of the binding energies are certainly too large (too negative). However, their relative magnitude is more reliable and allows to draw qualitative conclusions.
Mascarenhas and Kästner BMC Structural Biology 2012 12:8 doi:10.1186/1472-6807-12-8
