Table 4

Number of CHCs found in the two samples with the corresponding ΔACA.

SALTIN

HALOPHILE

Seq. lenght

NON

HALOPHILE

Seq. lenght

Sequence identity(%)

No. CHC

OSMOL

HALOPHILE

Seq. lenght

NON

HALOPHILE

Seq. lenght

Sequence identity(%)

No. CHC


1DOI

128

1FXA

98

51

50

1NWZ

125

1MZU

129

46

55

1TJO

182

2VXX

192

36

36

1CNO

87

1ETP

190

44

26

2B5W

357

2CD9

366

30

154

1NML

326

3HQ6

345

47

157

2CC6

68

2V18

68

42

33

2VPN

316

3FXB

326

64

132

1ITK

731

2FXG

748

60

514

3IGN

177

3I5C

206

62

63

2AZ3

164

3B54

161

54

71

3BSM

413

2QJJ

402

40

187

2J5K

304

1Y6J

318

33

101

3IBM

167

3KGZ

156

66

65

3IFV

247

1RWZ

245

36

104


Totala)

329.33

58.56

Averageb)

-0.31

-0.08

t-testc)

0.03

0.52

Wilcoxonc)

0.01

0.63


Number of conserved hydrophobic contacts (CHCs) found in the two samples and the corresponding overall difference of apolar contact area (ΔACA)

a) Total ΔACA in the CHCs

b) Average ΔACA in the CHCs

c) Boldfaced digits indicate significant p-values

Siglioccolo et al. BMC Structural Biology 2011 11:50   doi:10.1186/1472-6807-11-50

Open Data