BMC Biotechnology

official impact factor 2.86

Open Access Highly Access Research article

Development of patatin knockdown potato tubers using RNA interference (RNAi) technology, for the production of human-therapeutic glycoproteins

Yoon-Sik Kim1, Yong-Hwa Lee1, Hyun-Soon Kim1, Mi-Sun Kim1, Kyu-Woong Hahn2, Jeong-Heon Ko3, Hyouk Joung1 and Jae-Heung Jeon1*

Author Affiliations

1 Plant Genome Research Center, KRIBB, Daejeon 305-806, Korea

2 Department of Biological Sciences, Hannam University, Daejeon 306-791, Korea

3 Daejeon-KRIBB-FHCRC Research Cooperation Center, KRIBB, Daejeon 305-806, Korea

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Biotechnology 2008, 8:36 doi:10.1186/1472-6750-8-36

Published: 3 April 2008

Additional files

Additional file 1:

2D gel of potato (cv. Desiree) tuber proteins in patatin hpRNAi and WT plants. (A) 2D gel PI 4–7 of potato tuber protein of WT plants. (B) Patatin spots boxed in gel (A). (C) 2D gel PI 4–7 (the same area as (B)) of potato tuber proteins of patatin hpRNAi line 4. Patatin variants were almost completely suppressed in line 4, when compared to WT plants. Protein was extracted from potato tuber. 200 μg of protein extracts was separated by isoelectric focusing IPG pH 4–7 in the first dimension, and by 12.5% SDS/PAGE in the second dimension. The proteins were stained with silver nitrate.

Format: TIFF Size: 5.5MB Download file

Open Data

Additional file 2:

In vitro and ex vitro grown patatin hpRNAi lines display normal growth phenotype. (A) Wild-type and patatin hpRNAi lines grown in vitro. In vitro grown potato plants were cultivated at 24 ± 2°C for 4 weeks and then tuberization was induced at 20 ± 2°C for 4 weeks. WT and patatin hpRNAi lines produced round pink micro-tubers in various sizes in vitro. (B) Potato tubers of patatin hpRNAi lines and WT plants grown in a greenhouse for 14 weeks. (C) The number of potato tubers per plant and average tuber weight in WT and patatin hpRNAi lines grown in greenhouse. Lanes 1 to 10 are patatin hpRNAi potato lines. Mean and SD were derived by measurement of five plants per line. The error bars indicate mean ± SD. There were no significant difference in the mean values between WT and patatin hpRNAi lines, when assessed with Anova's t-test at P < 0.01, respectively. (D) Patatin hpRNAi lines and WT plants grown in greenhouse for 8 weeks. There were no phenotypic differences between WT and patatin hpRNAi lines.

Format: TIFF Size: 9.5MB Download file

Open Data