Table 2 |
|||
| shows the recurrence rate with the type of surgical reconstruction in each site | |||
| Location of Defects (total number:50) | Methods of reconstruction | Percentage of usage related to each region | Recurrence |
| Axilla | Rotation fasciocutaneous flap | 30,4 % | 39,6 % |
| (7 sites) | (2 patients) | ||
| 46 % | Transposition fasciocutaneous flap (Limberg flap) | 39,1 % | 11,1 % |
| Parascapular fasciocutaneous flap | (9 sites) | (1 patient) | |
| 21,7 % | 0 % | ||
| TDAP flap | (5 sites) | ||
| ALTP flap | 4,3 % | 0 % | |
| (1 site) | |||
| 4,3 % | 0 % | ||
| (1 site) | |||
| Inguinal | Primary closure | 47 % | 12,5 % |
| 34 % | Split-thickness skin graft | (8 sites) | (1 patient) |
| Rotation fasciocutaneous flap | 17,75 % | 33,3 % | |
| Transposition fasciocutaneous flap | (3 sites) | (1 patient) | |
| 17,75 % | 33,3 % | ||
| Abdominoplasty | (3 sites) | (1 patient) | |
| 11,8 % | 0 % | ||
| (2 sites) | |||
| 5,8 % | 0 % | ||
| (1 site) | |||
| Perianal/ Perineal 16 % | Transposition fasciocutaneous flap | 75 % | 0 % |
| Gracilis musculocutaneous flap | (6 sites) | ||
| 25 % | 0 % | ||
| (2 sites) | |||
| Gluteal | Split-thickness skin graft | 100 % | 0 % |
| 2 % | (1 site) | ||
| Trunk | Split-thickness skin graft | 100 % | 0 % |
| 2 % | (1 site) | ||
Alharbi et al. BMC Dermatology 2012 12:9 doi:10.1186/1471-5945-12-9
