Table 9 |
|||||||||||||||
|
Comparison of dichotomous efficacy results for sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil |
|||||||||||||||
|
Sildenafil (50/100 mg) |
Tadalafil (10/20 mg) |
Vardenafil (10/20 mg) |
|||||||||||||
|
Number of |
Percent with |
Number of |
Percent with |
Number of |
Percent with |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Outcome |
Trials |
Patients |
Sildenafil |
Placebo |
NNT/NNTp/NNH (95% CI) |
Trials |
Patients |
Tadalafil |
Placebo |
NNT/NNTp/NNH (95% CI) |
Trials |
Patients |
Vardenafil |
Placebo |
NNT/NNTp/NNH (95% CI) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Efficacy |
|||||||||||||||
|
Improved erections |
29 |
5467 |
76 |
23 |
1.9 (1.8 to 2.0) |
7 |
1651 |
75 |
24 |
1.9 (1.8 to 2.1) |
7 |
2856 |
71 |
22 |
2.0 (1.9 to 2.2) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Withdrawal |
|||||||||||||||
|
All-cause |
30 |
5562 |
8 |
12 |
23 (17 to 37) |
5 |
1334 |
13 |
19 |
15 (8.8 to 46) |
5 |
2061 |
20 |
32 |
7.7 (6.0 to 11) |
|
Lack of efficacy |
30 |
5463 |
1.2 |
4.4 |
25 (21 to 34) |
6 |
1435 |
3.3 |
7.5 |
24 (14 to 69) |
6 |
2320 |
4.0 |
12 |
11 (9.0 to 16) |
|
Adverse event |
31 |
5787 |
1.6 |
0.6 |
120 (67 to 560) |
7 |
1657 |
3.4 |
1.5 |
52 (29 to 260) |
7 |
2868 |
3.3 |
1.8 |
65 (37 to 250) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Adverse events |
|||||||||||||||
|
All cause |
18 |
2862 |
50 |
30 |
4.9 (4.2 to 6.0) |
3 |
590 |
47 |
25 |
4.6 (3.4 to 7.2) |
insufficient data |
||||
|
Serious |
17 |
2591 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
not calculated |
7 |
1655 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
not calculated |
5 |
1984 |
2.2 |
3.2 |
not calculated |
|
Headache |
34 |
6386 |
17 |
5.2 |
8.6 (7.6 to 10) |
7 |
1810 |
13 |
3.4 |
11 (8.5 to 14) |
6 |
2411 |
15 |
4.1 |
9.6 (7.9 to 12) |
|
Dyspepsia |
26 |
4967 |
7.8 |
2.3 |
18 (15 to 23) |
6 |
1401 |
10 |
0.2 |
11 (8.8 to 14) |
5 |
1972 |
3.8 |
0.3 |
31 (22 to 48) |
|
Flushing |
33 |
6363 |
13 |
1.9 |
9.0 (8.1 to 10) |
6 |
1530 |
4.8 |
0.2 |
24 (18 to 38) |
5 |
1984 |
13 |
0.8 |
8.0 (6.9 to 9.6) |
|
Rhinitis |
21 |
4283 |
5.4 |
2.1 |
31 (23 to 47) |
2 |
712 |
3.1 |
0.5 |
not calculated |
5 |
2212 |
7.9 |
3.6 |
23 (16 to 42) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
NNT is given in standard font, NNTp in bold, and NNH in bold italic. No NNT/NNTp/NNH was calculated unless there was a statistically significant difference |
|||||||||||||||
|
Moore et al. BMC Urology 2005 5:18 doi:10.1186/1471-2490-5-18 |
|||||||||||||||