Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Urology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Vasectomy surgical techniques in South and South East Asia

Michel Labrecque1*, John Pile2, David Sokal3, Ramachandra CM Kaza4, Mizanur Rahman5, SS Bodh6, Jeewan Bhattarai7, Ganesh D Bhatt7 and Tika Man Vaidya8

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Family Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada

2 EngenderHealth, 440 Ninth Avenue, New York, NY 10001 USA

3 Family Health International, 2224 Chapel Hill-Nelson Hwy Durham, NC, 27713 USA

4 Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India

5 EngenderHealth, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh

6 EngenderHealth, India Country Office, New Delhi, India

7 Chhetrapati Family Welfare Center, Chhetrapati, Kathmandu Nepal

8 Nepal Fertility Care Center, Jwagal Kopundole, Laitpur Nepal

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Urology 2005, 5:10  doi:10.1186/1471-2490-5-10

Published: 25 May 2005

Abstract

Background

Simple ligation of the vas with suture material and excision of a small vas segment is believed to be the most common vasectomy occlusion technique performed in low-resource settings. Ligation and excision (LE) is associated with a risk of occlusion and contraceptive failure which can be reduced by performing fascial interposition (FI) along with LE. Combining FI with intra luminal thermal cautery could be even more effective. The objective of this study was to determine the surgical vasectomy techniques currently used in five Asian countries and to evaluate the facilitating and limiting factors to introduction and assessment of FI and thermal cautery in these countries.

Methods

Between December 2003 and February 2004, 3 to 6 major vasectomy centers from Cambodia, Thailand, India, Nepal, and Bangladesh were visited and interviews with 5 to 11 key informants in each country were conducted. Vasectomy techniques performed in each center were observed. Vasectomy techniques using hand-held, battery-driven cautery devices and FI were demonstrated and performed under supervision by local providers. Information about interest and open-mindedness regarding the use of thermal cautery and/or FI was gathered.

Results

The use of vasectomy was marginal in Thailand and Cambodia. In India, Nepal, and Bangladesh, vasectomy was supported by national reproductive health programs. Most vasectomies were performed using the No-Scalpel Vasectomy (NSV) technique and simple LE. The addition of FI to LE, although largely known, was seldom performed. The main reasons reported were: 1) insufficient surgical skills, 2) time needed to perform the technique, and 3) technique not being mandatory according to country standards. Thermal cautery devices for vasectomy were not available in any selected countries. Pilot hands-on assessment showed that the technique could be safely and effectively performed by Asian providers. However, in addition to provision of supplies, introducing cautery with FI could be associated with the same barriers encountered when introducing FI in combination with LE.

Conclusion

Further studies assessing the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of implementation are needed before thermal cautery combined with FI is introduced in Asia on a large scale. Until thermal cautery is introduced in a country, vasectomy providers should practice LE with FI to maximize effectiveness of vasectomy procedure.