Peer Review reports
From: Complications after cryosurgery with new miniature cryoprobes in long hollow bones: An animal trial
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Jun 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 30 Aug 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Chapman |
| 1 Sep 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bettina Paek |
| 21 Oct 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Frank Popken |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 Oct 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 26 Nov 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bettina Paek |
| 30 Nov 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Chapman |
| 10 Jan 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Frank Popken |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 10 Jan 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 16 Feb 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bettina Paek |
| 3 Apr 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Frank Popken |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 3 Apr 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 19 Jul 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Frank Popken |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 19 Jul 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 24 Jul 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Frank Popken |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 24 Jul 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Aug 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Aug 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2482-5-17 |
You can find further information about peer review here.