Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Surgery and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Pudendal nerve decompression in perineology : a case series

Jacques Beco12*, Daniela Climov3 and Michèle Bex4

Author Affiliations

1 Gynaecology, CHU Sart-Tilman, University of Liège, B-4000 Liège, Belgium

2 Perineology, CHC-Clinique Sainte-Elisabeth, 17 rue du Naimeux, B-4802 Heusy, Belgium

3 Research, Institut d'Enseignement Supérieur Parnasse-Deux Alice, Avenue Mounier 84, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium

4 Physiotherapy, CHR La Citadelle, Boulevard du 12ème de Ligne, B-4000 Liège, Belgium

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Surgery 2004, 4:15  doi:10.1186/1471-2482-4-15

Published: 30 October 2004

Abstract

Background

Perineodynia (vulvodynia, perineal pain, proctalgia), anal and urinary incontinence are the main symptoms of the pudendal canal syndrome (PCS) or entrapment of the pudendal nerve. The first aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of bilateral pudendal nerve decompression (PND) on the symptoms of the PCS, on three clinical signs (abnormal sensibility, painful Alcock's canal, painful "skin rolling test") and on two neurophysiological tests: electromyography (EMG) and pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies (PNTML). The second aim was to study the clinical value of the aforementioned clinical signs in the diagnosis of PCS.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, the studied sample comprised 74 female patients who underwent a bilateral PND between 1995 and 2002. To accomplish the first aim, the patients sample was compared before and at least one year after surgery by means of descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing. The second aim was achieved by means of a statistical comparison between the patient's group before the operation and a control group of 82 women without any of the following signs: prolapse, anal incontinence, perineodynia, dyschesia and history of pelvi-perineal surgery.

Results

When bilateral PND was the only procedure done to treat the symptoms, the cure rates of perineodynia, anal incontinence and urinary incontinence were 8/14, 4/5 and 3/5, respectively. The frequency of the three clinical signs was significantly reduced. There was a significant reduction of anal and perineal PNTML and a significant increase of anal richness on EMG. The Odd Ratio of the three clinical signs in the diagnosis of PCS was 16,97 (95% CI = 4,68 – 61,51).

Conclusion

This study suggests that bilateral PND can treat perineodynia, anal and urinary incontinence. The three clinical signs of PCS seem to be efficient to suspect this diagnosis. There is a need for further studies to confirm these preliminary results.