Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Surgery and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

A survey of surgical team members’ perceptions of near misses and attitudes towards Time Out protocols

Arvid Steinar Haugen1*, Shamini Murugesh1, Rune Haaverstad23, Geir Egil Eide45 and Eirik Søfteland1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Jonas Liesvei 65, N-5021, Bergen, Norway

2 Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

3 Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

4 Center for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

5 Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Surgery 2013, 13:46  doi:10.1186/1471-2482-13-46

Published: 9 October 2013

Abstract

Background

Medical errors are inherently of concern in modern health care. Although surgical errors as incorrect surgery (e.g., wrong patient, wrong site, or wrong procedure) are infrequent, they are devastating events to experience. To gain insight about incidents that could lead to incorrect surgery, we surveyed how surgical team members perceive near misses and their attitudes towards the use of Time Out protocols in the operating room. We hypothesised that perceptions of near-miss experiences and attitudes towards Time Out protocols vary widely among surgical team members.

Methods

This cross-sectional study (N = 427) included surgeons, anaesthetists, nurse anaesthetists, and operating room nurses. The questionnaire consisted of 14 items, 11 of which had dichotomous responses (0 = no; 1 = yes) and 3 of which had responses on an ordinal scale (never = 0; sometimes = 1; often = 2; always = 3). Items reflected team members’ experience of near misses or mistakes; their strategies for verifying the correct patient, site, and procedure; questions about whether they believed that these mistakes could be avoided using the Time Out protocol; and how they would accept the implementation of the protocol in the operating room.

Results

In the operating room, 38% of respondents had experienced uncertainty of patient identity, 81% had experienced uncertainty of the surgical site or side, and 60% had prepared for the wrong procedure. Sixty-three per cent agreed that verifying the correct patient, site, and procedure should be a team responsibility. Thus, only nurse anaesthetists routinely performed identity checks prior to surgery (P ≤ 0.001). Of the surgical team members, 91% supported implementation of a Time Out protocol in their operating rooms.

Conclusion

The majority of our surgical personnel experienced near misses with regard to correct patient identity, surgical site, or procedure. Routines for ensuring the correct patient, site, and surgical procedure must involve all surgical team members. We find that the near-miss experiences are a wake-up call for systematic risk reducing efforts and the use of checklists in surgery.

Keywords:
Surgery; Operating room; Near misses; Medical errors; Checklist