Table 3

Clinicopathological features of eight patients who had T1 colorectal cancer with lymph node metastases
Sex Age Location Shape No of (+) LN Size (cm) Grade Depth LVI Budding MA§ Recurrence site DFS(months) OS (months)
μm Kudo
F 60 S†† Isp 1 1.8 MD††† 5000 Sm3 - + + No 54 54
M 64 Ra‡‡ Is 1 1.5 MD††† 1000 Sm1 - + + No 49 49
M 63 S†† Is 1 1.5 MD††† 3500 Sm3 - + + No 37 37
F 62 Rb§§ Is 6 3.2 MD††† 1500 Sm1 + + - liver 3 11
M 75 A∥∥ Is 2 1.8 MD††† 3000 Sm3 - - - No 15 15
F 78 A∥∥ Ip 4 6 WD‡‡‡ 3000 Sm2 + + - No 13 13
M 50 RS¶¶ Ip 2 3 MD††† NR§§§ NR§§§ NR§§§ NR§§§ NR§§§ No 13 13
M 60 S†† Ip 1 1.6 MD††† NR§§§ NR§§§ NR§§§ NR§§§ NR§§§ No 12 12

† = Lymph node, ‡ = Lymphovascular invasion, § = Microacinar structure, ∥ = Disease free survival,

¶ = Overall survival, †† = Sigmoid colon, ‡‡ = Rectum above peritoneal reflexion,

§§ = Rectum below peritoneal reflexion, ∥∥ = Ascending colon, ¶¶ = Rectosigmoid colon,

††† = Moderately differentiated, ‡‡‡ = Well differentiated, §§§ = Not reported.

Kye et al.

Kye et al. BMC Surgery 2012 12:16   doi:10.1186/1471-2482-12-16

Open Data