Table 3

Improved OA Pain Intensity and Patient's and Physician's Global Assessments of Disease Activity (ITT Population)


Lumiracoxib 100 mg o.d. (n = 755)
Lumiracoxib 100 mg b.i.d. (n = 1,519)
Celecoxib 200 mg o.d. (n = 758)

Patient's target joint pain intensity assessment



     Changes in scores from baseline to study endpoint, n (%)



          Improvement
382 (50.6)
795 (52.3)
406 (53.6)
          No change
269 (35.6)
566 (37.3)
265 (35.0)
          Worsened
104 (13.8)
158 (10.4)
87 (11.5)
     Overall measure of efficacy, least squares mean
2.78
2.72
2.77
Patient's global assessment of disease activity



     Changes in scores from baseline to study endpoint, n (%)



          Improvement
368 (48.7)
768 (50.6)
373 (49.2)
          No change
265 (35.1)
534 (35.2)
269 (35.5)
          Worsened
122 (16.2)
216 (14.2)
116 (15.3)
     Overall measure of efficacy, least squares mean
2.61
2.54
2.60
Physician's global assessment of disease activity



     Changes in scores from baseline to study endpoint, n (%)



          Improvement
411 (54.5)
888 (58.5)
425 (56.2)
          No change
244 (32.4)
463 (30.5)
232 (30.7)
          Worsened
99 (13.1)
167 (11.0)
99 (13.1)
     Overall measure of efficacy, least squares mean
2.55
2.45*
2.52

o.d. = once daily; b.i.d. = twice daily; ITT = intention-to-treat; patients with missing baseline values were not included; Overall measure of efficacy defined as the weighted average of post-baseline scores using the last observation carried forward technique for missing values and time since previous visit as weight (lower scores represent better responses); *p < 0.05 vs lumiracoxib 100 mg o.d. and celecoxib 200 mg o.d.

Fleischmann et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2008 9:32   doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-32