Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
28 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronald Feise |
5 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Henrica de Vet |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
29 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen Razmjou |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
29 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
12 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Henrica de Vet |
13 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronald Feise |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
28 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen Razmjou |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
28 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
4 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen Razmjou |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
4 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
5 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen Razmjou |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
5 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
5 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen Razmjou |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
5 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
22 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronald Feise |
3 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Helen Razmjou |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
3 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
13 Mar 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Mar 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-7-26 |
You can find further information about peer review here.