Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Aug 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
31 Aug 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - James Woodburn |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
31 Aug 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Oct 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen Lohmann Siegel |
9 Oct 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Rome |
25 Oct 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - James Woodburn |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
25 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
10 Nov 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Rome |
13 Nov 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen Lohmann Siegel |
4 Dec 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - James Woodburn |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Dec 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Dec 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - James Woodburn |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
4 Dec 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
15 Dec 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - James Woodburn |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
15 Dec 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
20 Dec 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - James Woodburn |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
20 Dec 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
21 Dec 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Dec 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-7-102 |
You can find further information about peer review here.