Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Histological, histomorphometric and microtomographic analyses of retrieval hip resurfacing arthroplasty failed at different times

Francesca Salamanna1*, Milena Fini12, Annapaola Parrilli1, Matteo Cadossi3, Nicolò Nicoli Aldini12, Gianluca Giavaresi12, Deianira Luciani3 and Sandro Giannini3

Author Affiliations

1 Laboratory of Biocompatibility, Innovative Technologies and Advanced Therapies, Rizzoli Research Innovation Technology, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy

2 Laboratory of Preclinical and Surgical Studies, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy

3 II Orthopaedic and Traumatology Clinic, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2013, 14:47  doi:10.1186/1471-2474-14-47

Published: 30 January 2013

Abstract

Background

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HR) has been gaining popularity especially for young and active patients. Although different series report good mid-term results, the long-term outcome and failure mechanisms are still concerning. In this consecutive revision case series, 9 retrieved specimens of a failed Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) were divided according to the time to fracture: 3 specimens failed at less than 6 months (Group 1), 3 failed between 6 months and 3 years (Group 2) and 3 failed later than 3 years (Group 3). The objective of the study was to examine by a specific quantitative histomorphometry and microtomography (micro-CT) method the characteristics of bone quality and its microarchitecture in retrieved metal-on-metal HR.

Methods

A series of 948 BHR were performed between 2001 and 2009. Among these implants 10 failures occurred and nine of these underwent revision surgery and were examined by histomorphometry and micro-CT.

Results

Histomorphometry showed a significant increase in trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) in Group 3 in comparison with Group 1 (113%, p < 0.05). In the top region, micro-CT showed that Groups 2 and 3 presented significant lower bone volume (Group 2: 61%, p < 0.005; Group 3: 1%, p < 0.05), trabecular number (Group 2: 53%, p < 0.005; Group 3: 40%, p < 0.05), and higher Tb.Sp (Group: 71%,p < 0.05) when compared to Group 1. Additionally, histomorphometry showed that the top regions in Group 1 had a significantly lower mean percentage of empty osteocyte lacunae than the top regions in both Group 2 and 3 (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

This study showed that the morphometric parameters considered are crucial for a good understanding of mechanical properties of HR and may be of significant importance in the pathogenesis of HR failure particularly in the development of late fractures.

Keywords:
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty; Failure; Histomorphometry; Microtomography