Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Construct validity of the interview Time Trade-Off and computer Time Trade-Off in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A cross-sectional observational pilot study

Laurien Buitinga1*, Louise MA Braakman-Jansen1, Erik Taal1 and Mart AFJ van de Laar12

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Institute for Innovation and Governance Studies, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

2 Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2012, 13:112  doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-112

Published: 25 June 2012

Abstract

Background

The Time Trade-Off (TTO) is a widely used instrument for valuing preference-based health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The TTO reveals preferences for own current health (‘utilities’) on a scale anchored between death (0) and perfect health (1). Limited information on the external validity of the TTO is available. Aim of this pilot study was to examine the construct validity of both an interview TTO and a computer-based TTO in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

Thirty patients visiting the outpatient rheumatology clinic participated. Construct validity was assessed by measuring convergent and discriminative validity. Convergent validity was assessed by calculating Spearman’s correlations between the utilities obtained from the TTOs and pain, general health (rating scales), health-related quality of life (SF-36 and SF-6D) and functional status (HAQ-DI). Discriminative power of both TTO measures was determined by comparing median utilities between worse and better health outcomes.

Results

Correlations of both TTO measures with HRQoL, general health, pain and functional status were poor (absolute values ranging from .05 to .26). Both TTOs appeared to have no discriminative value among groups of RA patients who had a worse or better health status defined by six health outcome measures. About one-third of respondents were zero-traders on each of the TTO measures. After excluding zero-traders from analysis, the correlations improved considerably.

Conclusions

Both the interview TTO and computer TTO showed poor construct validity in RA patients when using measures of HRQol, general health, pain and functional status as reference measures. Possibly, the validity of the TTO improves when using an anchor that is more realistic to RA patients than the anchor ‘death’.