Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Study protocol

Study protocol subacromial impingement syndrome: the identification of pathophysiologic mechanisms (SISTIM)

Pieter Bas de Witte14*, Jochem Nagels1, Ewoud RA van Arkel2, Cornelis PJ Visser3, Rob GHH Nelissen1 and Jurriaan H de Groot4

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Postzone J11R, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

2 Department of Orthopaedics, Medical Centre Haaglanden (MCH), Postbus 432, 2501 CK Den Haag, The Netherlands

3 Department of Orthopaedics, Rijnland Hospital, Simon Smitweg 1, 2353 GA Leiderdorp, The Netherlands

4 Laboratory for Kinematics and Neuromechanics, Departments of Rehabilitation and Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Postzone B0-Q, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2011, 12:282  doi:10.1186/1471-2474-12-282

Published: 14 December 2011

Abstract

Background

The Subacromial Impingement Syndrome (SIS) is the most common diagnosed disorder of the shoulder in primary health care, but its aetiology is unclear. Conservative treatment regimes focus at reduction of subacromial inflammatory reactions or pathologic scapulohumeral motion patterns (intrinsic aetiology). Long-lasting symptoms are often treated with surgery, which is focused at enlarging the subacromial space by resection of the anterior part of the acromion (based on extrinsic aetiology). Despite that acromionplasty is in the top-10 of orthopaedic surgical procedures, there is no consensus on its indications and reported results are variable (successful in 48-90%). We hypothesize that the aetiology of SIS, i.e. an increase in subacromial pressure or decrease of subacromial space, is multi-factorial. SIS can be the consequence of pathologic scapulohumeral motion patterns leading to humerus cranialisation, anatomical variations of the scapula and the humerus (e.g. hooked acromion), a subacromial inflammatory reaction (e.g. due to overuse or micro-trauma), or adjoining pathology (e.g. osteoarthritis in the acromion-clavicular-joint with subacromial osteophytes).

We believe patients should be treated according to their predominant etiological mechanism(s). Therefore, the objective of our study is to identify and discriminate etiological mechanisms occurring in SIS patients, in order to develop tailored diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Methods

In this cross-sectional descriptive study, applied clinical and experimental methods to identify intrinsic and extrinsic etiologic mechanisms comprise: MRI-arthrography (eligibility criteria, cuff status, 3D-segmented bony contours); 3D-motion tracking (scapulohumeral rhythm, arm range of motion, dynamic subacromial volume assessment by combining the 3D bony contours and 3D-kinematics); EMG (adductor co-activation) and dynamometry instrumented shoulder radiographs during arm tasks (force and muscle activation controlled acromiohumeral translation assessments); Clinical phenotyping (Constant Score, DASH, WORC, and SF-36 scores).

Discussion

By relating anatomic properties, kinematics and muscle dynamics to subacromial volume, we expect to identify one or more predominant pathophysiological mechanisms in every SIS patient. These differences in underlying mechanisms are a reflection of the variations in symptoms, clinical scores and outcomes reported in literature. More insight in these mechanisms is necessary in order to optimize future diagnostic and treatment strategies for patients with SIS symptoms.

Trial registration

Dutch Trial Registry (Nederlands Trial Register) NTR2283.