Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Vladimir Vilim |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
21 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lazaros Sakkas |
26 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amita Aggarwal |
12 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sybille Franke |
15 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Vladimir Vilim |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
15 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
30 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sybille Franke |
12 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lazaros Sakkas |
15 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amita Aggarwal |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
28 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Vladimir Vilim |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
28 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
3 May 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
3 May 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2474-11-83 |
You can find further information about peer review here.