Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Toward characterization and definition of fibromyalgia severity

Stuart Silverman, Alesia Sadosky*, Chris Evans, Yating Yeh, Jose Ma J Alvir and Gergana Zlateva

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2010, 11:66  doi:10.1186/1471-2474-11-66

PubMed Commons is an experimental system of commenting on PubMed abstracts, introduced in October 2013. Comments are displayed on the abstract page, but during the initial closed pilot, only registered users can read or post comments. Any researcher who is listed as an author of an article indexed by PubMed is entitled to participate in the pilot. If you would like to participate and need an invitation, please email, giving the PubMed ID of an article on which you are an author. For more information, see the PubMed Commons FAQ.

Is fibromyalgia a progressive condition?

Kim Lawson   (2010-08-05 11:03)  Sheffield Hallam University, UK email

The primary focus of the article of Silverman et al (BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2010, 11:66) towards the characterization of fibromyalgia (FM) severity is fundamental to a greater understanding of this condition. As correctly identified the limitations associated with potential biomarkers has not assisted in attempts of defining FM severity. It should also be noted a similar circumstance exists for the definition of the state of remission in FM, where often a lack of symptoms is viewed as a lack of the condition (ie an altered biology).
While the study and general interpretations of the outcomes are well constructed, there is however concern of the attempts to relate the measurement of FM severity with disease progression. This has led the authors to propose " slow progression is likely to have a broader clinical and economic impact...". This is a very valid statement if FM is a progressive condition. As stated within the discussion the findings related to severity progression of FM are equivocal. The study of Silverman et al uses a snap-shot, rather than longitudinal, design with self-selecting participants. The evidence, presented by the authors, associated with progression is based on the relationship of self-assessed severity and duration of FM, with the suggestion that a mild form of the condition develops into moderate-severe forms after 1-2 years. An alternative interpretation could be that those patients with a mild form are still coming to terms with their FM during the initial 12 months and thereby participate in such a survey. Thereafter, this patient group, perhaps, are more capable of accommodating for, and managing their condition, thus being less likely to respond to such a survey as that forming this article.
With this form of investigation, with participants self-selecting, it is essential that the reasons for engagement, or not as the case maybe, are considered in the design to avoid a skew of the outcomes and their interpretation.

Competing interests

None declared


Post a comment