Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
10 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicholas Hopkinson |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
10 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - José Martinez |
12 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dianna Kenny |
23 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicholas Hopkinson |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - José Martinez |
1 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dianna Kenny |
6 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicholas Hopkinson |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
6 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
2 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicholas Hopkinson |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
3 Aug 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Aug 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2466-10-41 |
You can find further information about peer review here.