Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 May 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Jun 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janice Probst |
23 Jun 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Miguel Goncalves |
21 Jul 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - fiona burns |
7 Nov 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Penny Cook |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
7 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janice Probst |
25 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Miguel Goncalves |
16 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Penny Cook |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
16 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
5 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Miguel Goncalves |
28 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Penny Cook |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
28 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
5 Mar 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Penny Cook |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
5 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
6 Mar 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
6 Mar 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-9-78 |
You can find further information about peer review here.