BMC Public Health

official impact factor 2.36

Open Access Research article

Assessing knowledge of human papillomavirus and collecting data on sexual behavior: computer assisted telephone versus face to face interviews

Anthony Smith1*, Anthony Lyons1, Marian Pitts1, Samantha Croy1, Richard Ryall1, Suzanne Garland2,3, Mee L Wong4 and Eng H Tay5

Author Affiliations

1 Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, 3000, Australia

2 Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Department, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, 3053, Australia

3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Australia

4 Department of Community, Occupational and Family Medicine, National University of Singapore, 119260, Singapore

5 Department of Gynaecological Subspecialties and Gynaecological Oncology Unit, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 229899, Singapore

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Public Health 2009, 9:429 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-429

Published: 23 November 2009

Abstract

Background

Education campaigns seeking to raise awareness of human papillomavirus (HPV) and promoting HPV vaccination depend on accurate surveys of public awareness and knowledge of HPV and related sexual behavior. However, the most recent population-based studies have relied largely on computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI) as opposed to face to face interviews (FTFI). It is currently unknown how these survey modes differ, and in particular whether they attract similar demographics and therefore lead to similar overall findings.

Methods

A comprehensive survey of HPV awareness and knowledge, including sexual behavior, was conducted among 3,045 Singaporean men and women, half of whom participated via CATI, the other half via FTFI.

Results

Overall levels of awareness and knowledge of HPV differed between CATI and FTFI, attributable in part to demographic variations between these survey modes. Although disclosure of sexual behavior was greater when using CATI, few differences between survey modes were found in the actual information disclosed.

Conclusion

Although CATI is a cheaper, faster alternative to FTFI and people appear more willing to provide information about sexual behavior when surveyed using CATI, thorough assessments of HPV awareness and knowledge depend on multiple survey modes.