Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
11 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
20 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Douglas Paul Gross |
3 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Debbie Cohen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
1 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Wout de Boer |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
13 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Wout de Boer |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
13 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
21 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Wout de Boer |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
21 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
27 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Wout de Boer |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
27 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
2 Jun 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
2 Jun 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-9-169 |
You can find further information about peer review here.