Table 2 |
||||
|
Logistica and linearb regression to predict reasons for not using smoking cessation aids from demographic, smoking behaviour, motivational, and health-related variables |
||||
|
Prediction variables |
Scale "Social and environmental barriers" OR (CI 95%) |
Scale "SCA unnecessary" β-weight |
||
|
|
||||
|
univariate |
multivariable |
univariate |
multivariable |
|
|
demographic variables |
||||
|
gender |
||||
|
malec |
||||
|
female |
.559 (.371–.843) |
.620 (.376–1.020) |
-.019 |
-d |
|
age |
1.004 (.989–1.019) |
- |
-.065 |
- |
|
educational level |
||||
|
< 10 yearsc |
||||
|
= 10 years |
.382 (.219–.668) |
.500 (.267–.936) |
-.013 |
|
|
> 10 years |
.220 (.111–.434) |
.297 (.139–.632) |
-.012 |
- |
|
marital status |
||||
|
married/living with a partnerc |
||||
|
not married/not living with a partner |
.783 (.486–1.262) |
- |
-.019 |
- |
|
smoking behaviour variables |
||||
|
cigarettes per day |
1.048 (1.015–1.082) |
1.015 (.969–1.063) |
.071 |
- |
|
FTND-Scoree |
1.274 (1.098–1.477) |
1.206 (.992–1.466) |
.041 |
- |
|
age at onset |
||||
|
< 16 yearsc |
||||
|
16–18 years |
1.219 (.758–1.959) |
.012 |
||
|
> 18 years |
1.091 (.613–1.942) |
- |
-.070 |
- |
|
quit attempts within the last 12 months |
||||
|
0c |
||||
|
1 |
1.379 (.780–2.438) |
.011 |
||
|
2–5 |
1.528 (.852–2.742) |
.057 |
||
|
>5 |
1.051 (.389–2.839) |
- |
.016 |
- |
|
smoking intensity |
1.012 (1.003–1.021) |
1.001 (.990–1.013) |
.076 |
- |
|
motivational variables |
||||
|
intention to quit within the next six months |
||||
|
noc |
||||
|
yes |
1.583 (1.013–2.473) |
2.008 (1.207–3.338) |
.121** |
.113** |
|
pros of non-smoking |
1.148 (.957–1.376) |
- |
.078 |
- |
|
self-efficacy |
.885 (.696–1.125) |
- |
.063 |
- |
|
health-related variables |
||||
|
mental health |
.927 (.684–1.257) |
- |
-.083* |
-.073 |
|
general health |
.989 (.976–1.001) |
- |
.022 |
- |
|
|
||||
|
All analyses were adjusted for study membership (population-based vs. general practice patient sample) as well as study group membership (intervention vs. control condition). a Scale „Social and environmental barriers", due to substantial non-normality the scale was dichotomised using 0 = no agreement, 1 = at least minimal agreement b Scale "SCA unnecessary" c Reference category d Not sufficient for multivariable analysis e Because cigarettes per day were used as separate predictor, the FTND score was computed without cigarettes per day to avoid multi-collinearity * p < .05; ** p < .01 |
||||
|
Gross et al. BMC Public Health 2008 8:129 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-129 |
||||