Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Public Health and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of the HIV intervention programme amongst commercial sex workers in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Isaac C-H Fung1*, Lorna Guinness2, Peter Vickerman2, Charlotte Watts2, Gangadhar Vannela3, Jagdish Vadhvana4, Anna M Foss2, Laxman Malodia5, Meena Gandhi6 and Gaurang Jani47

Author Affiliations

1 MSc Control of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

2 Health Policy Unit, Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

3 Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA

4 Jyoti Sangh, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

5 AIDS Control Society, Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

6 Resource Centre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS, New Delhi, India

7 Department of Sociology, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Public Health 2007, 7:195  doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-195

Published: 6 August 2007

Abstract

Background

Ahmedabad is an industrial city in Gujarat, India. In 2003, the HIV prevalence among commercial sex workers (CSWs) in Ahmedabad reached 13.0%. In response, the Jyoti Sangh HIV prevention programme for CSWs was initiated, which involves outreach, peer education, condom distribution, and free STD clinics. Two surveys were performed among CSWs in 1999 and 2003. This study estimates the cost-effectiveness of the Jyoti Sangh HIV prevention programme.

Methods

A dynamic mathematical model was used with survey and intervention-specific data from Ahmedabad to estimate the HIV impact of the Jyoti Sangh project for the 51 months between the two CSW surveys. Uncertainty analysis was used to obtain different model fits to the HIV/STI epidemiological data, producing a range for the HIV impact of the project. Financial and economic costs of the intervention were estimated from the provider's perspective for the same time period. The cost per HIV-infection averted was estimated.

Results

Over 51 months, projections suggest that the intervention averted 624 and 5,131 HIV cases among the CSWs and their clients, respectively. This equates to a 54% and 51% decrease in the HIV infections that would have occurred among the CSWs and clients without the intervention. In the absence of intervention, the model predicts that the HIV prevalence amongst the CSWs in 2003 would have been 26%, almost twice that with the intervention. Cost per HIV infection averted, excluding and including peer educator economic costs, was USD 59 and USD 98 respectively.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that targeted CSW interventions in India can be cost-effective, and highlights the importance of replicating this effort in other similar settings.