Research article
Cannabis treatment outcomes among legally coerced and non-coerced adults
-
* Corresponding author: Jan Copeland J.Copeland@unsw.edu.au
- † Equal contributors
1 National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia
2 Addiction Research Institute, Center for Social Work Research, University of Texas at Austin, USA
BMC Public Health 2007, 7:111 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-111
Published: 14 June 2007Abstract
Background
Treatment seeking for cannabis dependence in general, and particularly the number of criminal justice referrals to cannabis treatment, has increased over the past decade. This study aims to compare the characteristics, psychosocial functioning and treatment outcome of those legally coerced into cannabis treatment compared to those entering treatment without legal coercion.
Methods
This study is a retrospective audit of the administrative clinical records of 27,198 adults presenting to public Texas treatment programs with cannabis as their primary drug problem between 2000 and 2005.
Results
Of the 69% legally coerced into treatment, there was less psychological distress and greater likelihood of having completed treatment compared with non-coerced clients. Participants who were legally coerced into treatment were also more likely to have received less intensive forms of treatment and to have not used cannabis in the month prior to 90-day post-treatment follow-up.
Conclusion
More public health information is needed on cannabis dependence and increased availability of subsidised early and brief interventions in a variety of primary health care settings would reduce the late presentations of the more severely impaired voluntary clients. The limitations of this dataset are discussed.