Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 Aug 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael McGeehin |
12 Sep 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Mercer |
30 Oct 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Vladimir Kendrovski |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
30 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
18 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Mercer |
23 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael McGeehin |
2 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Vladimir Kendrovski |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
2 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
19 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Mercer |
13 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Vladimir Kendrovski |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
13 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
30 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Vladimir Kendrovski |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
30 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
7 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Vladimir Kendrovski |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
7 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
23 Feb 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
23 Feb 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-6-44 |
You can find further information about peer review here.