Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
13 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Theo Sandfort |
15 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Cochran |
4 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Irwin Nazareth |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
4 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
5 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Irwin Nazareth |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
5 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
30 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Cochran |
13 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Theo Sandfort |
9 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Irwin Nazareth |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Theo Sandfort |
19 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Irwin Nazareth |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
19 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
22 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Irwin Nazareth |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
22 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
30 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Irwin Nazareth |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
30 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
5 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Irwin Nazareth |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
5 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
8 May 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
8 May 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-6-127 |
You can find further information about peer review here.