Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Public Health and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Correspondence

The science of epidemiology and the methods needed for public health assessments: a review of epidemiology textbooks

Hebe N Gouda12* and John W Powles1

Author Affiliations

1 Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK

2 School of Population Health, Herston Campus, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Public Health 2014, 14:139  doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-139

Published: 10 February 2014

Abstract

Objectives

Epidemiology is often described as ‘the science of public health’. Here we aim to assess the extent that epidemiological methods, as covered in contemporary standard textbooks, provide tools that can assess the relative magnitude of public health problems and can be used to help rank and assess public health priorities.

Study Design

Narrative literature review.

Methods

Thirty textbooks were grouped into three categories; pure, extended or applied epidemiology, were reviewed with attention to the ways the discipline is characterised and the nature of the analytical methods described.

Results

Pure texts tend to present a strict hierarchy of methods with those metrics deemed to best serve aetiological inquiry at the top. Extended and applied texts employ broader definitions of epidemiology but in most cases, the metrics described are also those used in aetiological inquiry and may not be optimal for capturing the consequences and social importance of injuries and disease onsets.

Conclusions

The primary scientific purpose of epidemiology, even amongst ‘applied’ textbooks, is aetiological inquiry. Authors do not readily extend to methods suitable for assessing public health problems and priorities.

Keywords:
Public health; Epidemiological methods; Population health metrics