Peer Review reports
From: Comparison of two methods for assessing diabetes risk in a pharmacy setting in Australia
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 May 2014 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 21 May 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Monique Kilkenny |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 21 May 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 15 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ines Krass |
| 14 Jul 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Dunbar |
| 21 Aug 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Monique Kilkenny |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 21 Aug 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 26 Aug 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ines Krass |
| 4 Sep 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Dunbar |
| 13 Oct 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Monique Kilkenny |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 13 Oct 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 17 Nov 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 27 Nov 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1227 |
You can find further information about peer review here.