Table 2

Relative risks of school characteristics associated with full or partial delivery, compared to non-delivery, of the education program (n=178 schools)
Univariable Adjusted
% RR (95% CI) p value aRR (95% CI) p value
Study allocation
  Control 37.8 ref ref
  Intervention 85.2 2.26 (1.71, 2.98) <0.001 2.21 (1.69, 2.90) <0.001
Area
  Bristol 42.9 ref ref
  Bath and North East Somerset 94.4 2.20 (1.41, 3.43) <0.001 2.22 (1.39, 3.56) 0.001
  North Somerset 63.6 1.48 (0.90, 2.45) 0.122 1.41 (0.89, 2.27) 0.143
  South Gloucestershire 53.9 1.26 (0.72, 2.20) 0.423 1.06 (0.65, 1.74) 0.807
  Swindon 60.0 1.40 (0.80, 2.45) 0.238 1.56 (0.89, 2.70) 0.118
  Wiltshire 62.3 1.45 (0.90, 2.34) 0.125 1.46 (0.90, 2.35) 0.126
Involved in substudy
  No 60.4 ref ref
  Yes 66.7 1.10 (0.81, 1.51) 0.534 1.43 (1.04, 1.98) 0.030
Number of pupils
  194 or less 60.2 ref ref
  >194 62.4 1.04 (0.82, 1.31) 0.770 1.01 (0.83, 1.24) 0.903
Proportion eligible for free school meals
  6.4% or less 65.2 ref ref
  >6.4% 57.3 0.88 (0.69, 1.11) 0.285 0.88 (0.71, 1.08) 0.219

Note. Adjusted model includes all variables in table; CI confidence interval, RR relative risk, aRR adjusted relative risk, ref reference category.

Chittleborough et al.

Chittleborough et al. BMC Public Health 2013 13:757   doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-757

Open Data