Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 15 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Dianna Smith |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 15 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 26 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shannon Zenk |
| 12 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lukar Thornton |
| 13 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Dianna Smith |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 13 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 14 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Dianna Smith |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 14 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 26 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lukar Thornton |
| 6 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shannon Zenk |
| 25 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Dianna Smith |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 25 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 17 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - H Sachdev |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 18 Dec 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 24 Jan 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-70 |
You can find further information about peer review here.