Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Public Health and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Disparities in reported psychosocial assessment across public and private maternity settings: a national survey of women in Australia

Nicole Reilly1*, Sheree Harris23, Deborah Loxton23, Catherine Chojenta23, Peta Forder23, Jeannette Milgrom45 and Marie-Paule Austin1

Author Affiliations

1 Perinatal and Women’s Mental Health Unit, St John of God Health Care and University of New South Wales, PO Box 261, Burwood, NSW 1805, Australia

2 Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia

3 Research Centre for Gender, Health & Ageing, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia

4 Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia

5 Department of Clinical and Health Psychology and Parent-Infant Research Institute, Austin Health, Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital, Heidelberg Heights, Victoria 3081, Australia

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Public Health 2013, 13:632  doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-632

Published: 4 July 2013

Abstract

Background

Psychosocial assessment and depression screening is now recommended for all women who are pregnant or have recently given birth in Australia. Existing studies which have examined the extent of participation by women in such population-based programs have been primarily concerned with depression screening rather than a more comprehensive examination of psychosocial assessment, and have not been sufficiently inclusive of the 30% of women whose maternity care is provided in the private sector. Whether there are disparities in equity of access to perinatal psychosocial assessment is also unknown.

Methods

A sub-sample of women (N = 1804) drawn from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health participated in the study. Overall rates of assessment across five psychosocial domains (current emotional health; mental health history; current level of support; current drug or alcohol use; experience of domestic violence or abuse), as well as receipt of mental health promotion information, were examined. Log binomial regression was performed to investigate whether there were socio-demographic or health system inequalities among women who are and are not assessed across each domain.

Results

Two-thirds of women (66.8%) reported being asked about their current emotional health in the antenatal period, increasing to 75.6% of women in the postnatal period. Rates decreased markedly for reported assessment of mental health history (52.9% during pregnancy and 41.2% postnatally). Women were least likely to be asked about their experience of domestic violence or abuse in both the antenatal and postnatal periods (in total, 35.7% and 31.8%, respectively).

In terms of equity of access to psychosocial assessment, women who gave birth in the public hospital sector were more likely to report being assessed across all domains of assessment in the antenatal period, compared with women who gave birth in the private sector, after adjusting for other significant covariates. State of residence was associated with reported rates of assessment across all domains in both the antenatal and postnatal periods. Women from non-English speaking backgrounds and women with more than one child were less likely to be assessed across various domains.

Conclusion

This study provides an important insight into the reported overall penetration of and access to perinatal psychosocial assessment among a sample of women in Australia. Opportunities to minimise the current shortfall in assessment rates, particularly in the private sector, and for ongoing monitoring of assessment activity at a national level are discussed.

Keywords:
Antenatal; Postnatal; Depression screening; Psychosocial assessment; Health equity