Table 2 |
||||
| Total adolescents, boys, and girls reporting problems in pain dimension (EQ-5D), before and 1 year after screening-detected celiac disease diagnosis, compared to referents without celiac disease | ||||
| Groups at Baseline and Follow-up | Screening-detected CD (cases) | Non CD (referents) | Odds Ratios (95% CI)a | |
| n (%) with problems | n (%) with problems | Bivariate LRb | Multivariate LRc | |
| Total | n = 103 | n = 483 | ||
| Baseline | 21 (20.4) | 95 (19.7) | 0.96 (0.56-1.62) | 1.18 (0.69-2.02) |
| Follow-up | 13 (12.6) | 106 (21.9) | 0.51 (0.28-0.96) | 0.50 (0.27-0.94) |
| Boys | n = 47 | n = 208 | ||
| Baseline | 13 (27.7) | 41 (19.7) | 1.56 (0.76-3.22) | 1.90 (0.90-4.03) |
| Follow-up | 2 (4.3) | 39 (18.8) | 0.19 (0.05-0.83) | 0.17 (0.04-0.73) |
| Girls | n = 56 | n = 275 | ||
| Baseline | 8 (14.3) | 54 (19.6) | 0.68 (0.31-1.53) | 0.72 (0.32-1.62) |
| Follow-up | 11 (19.6) | 67 (24.4) | 0.76 (0.37-1.55) | 0.81 (0.39-1.67) |
a Odds ratio (95% confidence interval).
b Bivariate logistic regression using case/referent and problems reported.
c Multivariate logistic regression using case/referent and problems reported at baseline and problems reported at follow-up.
Nordyke et al. BMC Public Health 2013 13:142 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-142
