Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
30 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Katie Newby |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
30 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
12 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joshua Daniel Newton |
9 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rik Crutzen |
18 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kevin Theunissen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
25 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Katie Newby |
27 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rik Crutzen |
9 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joshua Daniel Newton |
15 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kevin Theunissen |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
5 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-133 |
You can find further information about peer review here.