Table 3

ORs and 95%CIs for IFG compared with normal glucose from multiple logistic regression model
Variables Overall Men Women
OR (95%) OR (95%) OR (95%)
Sex
Women 1.00 (Reference)
Men 1.99*(1.99-2.00)
Age 1.03*(1.03-1.04) 1.03*(1.03-1.03) 1.04*(1.04-1.04)
BMI group
BMI < 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
27 > BMI ≥ 24 (Overweight) 1.44*(1.43-1.44) 1.38*(1.38-1.39) 1.69*(1.68-1.70)
BMI ≥ 27 (Obesity) 2.74*(2.73-2.76) 4.01*(3.98-4.03) 2.16*(2.15-2.17)
Abdominal obesity
No 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 1.63*(1.63-1. 64) 1.54*(1.53-1.55) 1.46*(1.45-1.46)
Hypertension
No 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 1.42*(1.42-1.43) 1.33*(1.32-1.33) 1.53*(1.52-1.54)
Hyperlipidemia
No 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 1.17*(1.16-1.17) 1.06*(1.05-1.06) 1.25*(1.25-1.26)

*P < 0.01.

Logistic regression: associated risk factors were selected stepwise in model taking IFG as a dependent variable. Variables included in the model were: sex, age, BMI group, abdominal obesity, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.

Chen and Yeh

Chen and Yeh BMC Public Health 2013 13:1123   doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1123

Open Data