Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Public Health and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Work stress, life stress, and smoking among rural–urban migrant workers in China

Xiaobo Cui1, Ian RH Rockett2, Tingzhong Yang3* and Ruoxiang Cao4

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Health Education, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

2 Injury Control Research Center and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506-9190, USA

3 Center for Tobacco Control Research, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 310058, PR China

4 Institute of Health Education, Beijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Public Health 2012, 12:979  doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-979

Published: 14 November 2012

Abstract

Background

Stimulated by rapid modernization and industrialization, there is massive rural–urban migration in China. The migrants are highly susceptible to smoking and mental health problems. This study examined the association between both perceived work stress and perceived life stress with smoking behavior among this group during the period of migration.

Methods

Participants (n = 1,595) were identified through stratified, multi-stage, systematic sampling. Smoking status separated non-smokers from daily and occasional smokers, and migration history, work stress, and life stress were also measured. Analyses were conducted using the Chi-square test and multiple logistic regression. Two models were utilized. The first was the full model that comprised sociodemographic and migration-related characteristics, as well as the two stress variables. In addressing potential overlap between life and work stress, the second model eliminated one of the two stress variables as appropriate.

Results

Overall smoking prevalence was 64.9% (95% CI: 62.4-67.2%). In the regression analysis, under the full model, migrants with high perceived life stress showed a 45% excess likelihood to be current smokers relative to low-stress counterparts (OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.05 – 2.06). Applying the second model, which excluded the life stress variable, migrants with high perceived work stress had a 75% excess likelihood to be current smokers relative to opposites (OR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.26–2.45).

Conclusions

Rural–urban migrant workers manifested a high prevalence of both life stress and work stress. While both forms of stress showed associations with current smoking, life stress appeared to outweigh the impact of work stress. Our findings could inform the design of tobacco control programs that would target Chinese rural–urban migrant workers as a special population.

Keywords:
Smoking; Work stress; Life stress; Rural–urban migrant workers