Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Public Health and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

The implementation of a community-based aerobic walking program for mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA): a knowledge translation (KT) randomized controlled trial (RCT): Part I: The Uptake of the Ottawa Panel clinical practice guidelines (CPGs)

Lucie Brosseau1*, George A Wells2, Glen P Kenny3, Robert Reid4, Andreas Maetzel5, Peter Tugwell6, Maria Huijbregts7, Carolyn McCullough8, Gino De Angelis2 and Lily Chen4

Author Affiliations

1 University Research Chair, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

2 Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

3 School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

4 University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada

5 University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

6 Centre for Global Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

7 Baycrest Centre, Toronto, Canada

8 Inter-Action Rehabilitation Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Public Health 2012, 12:871  doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-871

Published: 13 October 2012

Abstract

Background

The implementation of evidence based clinical practice guidelines on self-management interventions to patients with chronic diseases is a complex process. A multifaceted strategy may offer an effective knowledge translation (KT) intervention to promote knowledge uptake and improve adherence in an effective walking program based on the Ottawa Panel Evidence Based Clinical Practice Guidelines among individuals with moderate osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

A single-blind, randomized control trial was conducted. Patients with mild to moderate (OA) of the knee (n=222) were randomized to one of three KT groups: 1) Walking and Behavioural intervention (WB) (18 males, 57 females) which included the supervised community-based aerobic walking program combined with a behavioural intervention and an educational pamphlet on the benefits of walking for OA; 2) Walking intervention (W) (24 males, 57 females) wherein participants only received the supervised community-based aerobic walking program intervention and the educational pamphlet; 3) Self-directed control (C) (32 males, 52 females) wherein participants only received the educational pamphlet. One-way analyses of variance were used to test for differences in quality of life, adherence, confidence, and clinical outcomes among the study groups at each 3 month assessment during the 12-month intervention period and 6-month follow-up period.

Results

Short-term program adherence was greater in WB compared to C (p<0.012) after 3 months. No statistical significance (p> 0.05) was observed for long-term adherence (6 to 12 months), and total adherence between the three groups. The three knowledge translation strategies demonstrated equivalent long-term results for the implementation of a walking program for older individuals with moderate OA. Lower dropout rates as well as higher retention rates were observed for WB at 12 and 18 months.

Conclusion

The additional knowledge translation behavioural component facilitated the implementation of clinical practice guidelines on walking over a short-term period. More studies are needed to improve the long-term walking adherence or longer guidelines uptake on walking among participants with OA. Particular attention should be taken into account related to patient’s characteristic and preference. OA can be managed through the implementation of a walking program based on clinical practice guidelines in existing community-based walking clubs as well as at home with the minimal support of an exercise therapist or a trained volunteer.

Trial Registration

Current Controlled Trials IRSCTNO9193542

Keywords:
Osteoarthritis; Clinical trial; Walking; Adherence; Education; Behavioural intervention; Guidelines implementation; Knowledge translation