|Summary results of evidence on the relationship environmental factors and transportation walking|
|Environm. variables||Positive association||Negative association||No association||A*||B*||C*||D*|
|Walkability||78, 82, 83, 85, 86||82||5||4/5||80||++|
|Access to shops/services/work||63, 77||85||77||3||2/4||50||0|
|Access to public transport||50||1||N/A||N/A||N/A|
|Access to recreation facilities||52, 52, 85, 92, 92, 92, 92, 92, 92, 92,92, 92, 92||3||0/13||0||0|
|Walking/cycling facilities||85, 85||1||N/A||N/A||N/A|
|Crime-related safety||63, 85||2||N/A||N/A||N/A|
|Aesthetics||63||63, 85||63, 85||2||N/A||N/A||N/A|
|Quality of environment||77M, 77F||1||N/A||N/A||N/A|
* A = n° of independent studies; B = n° of associated records divided by all records; C = % of evidence; D = summary code.
Regular vs italics font = subjective vs objective PA measures; regular vs bold font = subjective vs objective environmental measures.
M = specific results for males; F = specific results for females.
Van Holle et al.
Van Holle et al. BMC Public Health 2012 12:807 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-807