Table 4

Predictors of subsequent behavioural actions engaging with campaigna(binary yes/no) (n = 83**)
Individual social contact elements Individual social contact elements Individual social contact elements Individual social contact elements Additive social contact
OR(95% CI) OR(95% CI) OR(95% CI) OR(95% CI) OR(95% CI)
Age 1.0 (1.0, 1.1) 1.0 (1.0, 1.1) 1.0 (0.9, 1.1) 1.0 (0.9, 1.1) 1.0 (1.0, 1.1)
Gender 0.4 (0.1, 2.0) 0.7 (0.1, 3.6) 0.6 (0.1, 2.9) 0.6 (0.1, 3.0) 0.6 (0.1, 2.9)
BME 0.6 (0.1, 3.8) 0.7 (0.1, 3.7) 0.7 (0.1, 3.8) 0.8 (0.2, 3.8) 0.7 (0.1, 3.7)
Experience of Mental Health Problems (yes/no) 0.8 (0.2, 3.6) 1.2 (0.3, 5.4) 1.1 (0.2, 4.7 ) 1.1 (0.3, 4.6) 1.0 (0.2, 4.6)
Specific Social contact Factors
 Equal Status *7.0 (1.6, 31.3) -- -- -- --
 Common Goals -- 2.3 (0.9, 5.8) -- -- --
 Intergroup cooperation -- -- 1.9 (0.8, 4.5) -- --Sus
 Friendship potential -- -- -- 1.1 (0.3, 4.6) --
Quality of Social contact (Number of factors) -- -- -- -- *1.4 (1.0,1.9)
Initial RIBS Score *1.3 (1.0, 1.7) *1.4 (1.1, 1.8) *1.4 (1.0, 1.8) *1.4 (1.0, 1.8) *1.4 (1.0, 1.7)
Initial willingness to disclose 0.8 (0.5, 1.2) 0.9 (0.6, 1.3) 0.8 (0.6, 1.3) 0.9 (0.6, 1.3) 0.8 (0.6, 1.3)

*p <0.05

asubsequent behavioural actions engaging with campaign refer to the following actions: visiting the TTC website, pledging support via the TTC visual pledge, talking with others about the TTC event, or following TTC on Facebook or Twitter

Evans-Lacko et al.

Evans-Lacko et al. BMC Public Health 2012 12:489   doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-489

Open Data