Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Public Health and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Study protocol

Nutrition education intervention for dependent patients: protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Victoria Arija1234*, Núria Martín1, Teresa Canela1, Carme Anguera1, Ana I Castelao1, Montserrat García-Barco1, Antoni García-Campo1, Ana I González-Bravo1, Carme Lucena1, Teresa Martínez1, Silvia Fernández-Barrés2, Roser Pedret1, Waleska Badia1 and Josep Basora123

Author Affiliations

1 Atención Primaria. Institut Català de la Salut, Tarragona, Spain

2 Institut d’Investigació en Atenció Primària IDIAP Jordi Gol, Catalunya, Spain

3 IISPV, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain

4 Centre d’Atenció Primària Sant Pere, Camí de Riudoms, 53-55, 43202 Reus, Tarragona, Spain

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Public Health 2012, 12:373  doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-373

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/373


Received:16 February 2012
Accepted:28 February 2012
Published:24 May 2012

© 2012 Arija et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Malnutrition in dependent patients has a high prevalence and can influence the prognosis associated with diverse pathologic processes, decrease quality of life, and increase morbidity-mortality and hospital admissions.

The aim of the study is to assess the effect of an educational intervention for caregivers on the nutritional status of dependent patients at risk of malnutrition.

Methods/Design

Intervention study with control group, randomly allocated, of 200 patients of the Home Care Program carried out in 8 Primary Care Centers (Spain). These patients are dependent and at risk of malnutrition, older than 65, and have caregivers. The socioeconomic and educational characteristics of the patient and the caregiver are recorded. On a schedule of 0–6–12 months, patients are evaluated as follows: Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), food intake, dentures, degree of dependency (Barthel test), cognitive state (Pfeiffer test), mood status (Yesavage test), and anthropometric and serum parameters of nutritional status: albumin, prealbumin, transferrin, haemoglobin, lymphocyte count, iron, and ferritin.

Prior to the intervention, the educational procedure and the design of educational material are standardized among nurses. The nurses conduct an initial session for caregivers and then monitor the education impact at home every month (4 visits) up to 6 months. The North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) methodology will be used. The investigators will study the effect of the intervention with caregivers on the patient’s nutritional status using the MNA test, diet, anthropometry, and biochemical parameters.

Bivariate normal test statistics and multivariate models will be created to adjust the effect of the intervention.

The SPSS/PC program will be used for statistical analysis.

Discussion

The nutritional status of dependent patients has been little studied. This study allows us to know nutritional risk from different points of view: diet, anthropometry and biochemistry in dependent patients at nutritional risk and to assess the effect of a nutritional education intervention. The design with random allocation, inclusion of all patients, validated methods, caregivers’ education and standardization between nurses allows us to obtain valuable information about nutritional status and prevention.

Trial Registration number

Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov webcite. Unique identifier: NCT01360775

Background

There is evidence that malnutrition is common in the elderly and may influence the prognosis associated with several pathological processes, loss of independence, decrease of quality of life, and increase of morbidity-mortality and hospital admissions [1-3].

Malnutrition prevalence has been reported as 3–5% in free-living older adults and 11.6% to 60% in institutionalized individuals [4,5] but a recent study showed 21.3% in home care patients [5].

Educational programs for the elderly, including nutritional advice, have observed improvement in health status [6]. In Barcelona, a controlled trial was conducted in chronically ill 65-year-old patients and healthy controls. The intervention consisted of a self-care program as well as education on physical activity, nutrition, and social support; a statistically significant difference was observed in nutritional status [7].

Aging is related to a loss of functional capacity, and the role of caregiver becomes crucial to quality of life and for both prevention and treatment of malnutrition in dependent patients. A caregiver support program for hospitalized dependent patients observed that the support obtained positive results for the dependent patients [8]. In Finland, a nutrition education program based on constructive learning theory was developed to educate professional caregivers of patients with dementia. After one year, the study concluded that education had positive effects on the nutrition of patients [9].

However, educational interventions for caregivers of Alzheimer patients in France [10] and Parkinson patients in Europe [11] have not proven effective.

The Mini Nutritional Assessment Test (MNA), commonly used to assess nutritional status because it can be done quickly, has been validated for screening and assessment of malnutrition in older people, including the use of a reduced version [12-14]. Harris et al. noted that the MNA test has a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 90% [15]. Different programs have affirmed the ability of the geriatric nutritional risk index to assess the nutritional status of patients at home [16,17]. A study using the MNA found that 67.6% of subjects treated in a Home Care Program and 93.1% of the institutionalized subjects were malnourished or at risk of malnutrition; with adjusted data, this risk was 4.4 times higher among Home Care Program patients than institutionalized ones [18].

While the use of MNA as a screening tool is well established, the assessment of nutritional status and in particular of the changes produced by an intervention should have more specific estimator instruments. A recent study observes that age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) are responsible for 11.3% of the variability of the MNA test, whereas MNA items related to diet are responsible for 62.5% of this variability, indicating the importance of diet on the change in nutritional status. On one hand, this observation indicates that the most important items affecting improvement of nutritional status are the adequacy of the patient’s diet and, on the other, that more accurate methods of assessing food consumption are needed to determine the change in the diet [19].

Furthermore, the most important risk factors for malnutrition in elderly patients have been identified as number of teeth [20], depression [21], and dementia [22]. This indicates the importance of assessing these health problems in addition to the MNA test, and of this entire assessment being done by nurses in patient care programs at the household level [23].

A Home Care Program for dependent patients has been developed by Primary Health Care (PHC) services in our environment to guarantee continuity of care, access to services, and equality in care of these patients who for various reasons cannot go to a Primary Care Center (PCC).

The aim of the study is to assess the effect of a nutritional education intervention aimed at caregivers on the nutritional status of dependent patients at risk of malnutrition.

Methods

Design

The study design is a randomized controlled trial; intervention consists of nutritional education for caregivers of approximately 200 dependent patients at risk of malnutrition, conducted in the Home Care program in various PCC of the Tarragona-Reus area.

Research procedure is diagrammed in Figure 1.

thumbnailFigure 1. Research procedure.

Study population

Subjects will meet the following inclusion criteria: 1) participation in the Home Care program (ATDOM), 2) aged 65 years or older, 3) MNA score from 17 to 23.5 points, and 4) must have a caregiver. Exclusion criteria are: 1) MNA score outside the range of 17 to 23.5 points, 2) enteral feeding required, 3) severe dysphagia, 4) any serious illness that progresses to malnutrition, and 5) consumption of vitamin and/or dietary supplements.

Recruitment

Random selection of 8 PCCs of the Catalan Institute of Health (ICS) in Reus and Tarragona counties, stratified to represent different geographical areas: a) 4 PCCs in 2 cities over 100,000 population (2 in Reus and 2 in Tarragona), b) 2 PCCs in the suburbs of these cities (1 in Tarragona, 1 in Reus), c) 1 PCC in a medium-sized urban area (about 30,000 inhabitants), and d) 1 PCC in rural areas.

Subjects will be recruited by initial identification in the electronic medical record (e-cap) indicating that they meet the criteria for participation, to be verified by performing a baseline MNA test.

Randomization of groups

After subjects provide signed written informed consent, they will be classified randomly. From a common database, subjects will be computer-assigned to the intervention group and non-intervention (control) group in each PCC, proportionally to the total number of subjects. Subjects who choose not to participate in the study will be replaced by others of the same sex, age, and PCC to obtain the initial total sample of 97 subjects in each group.

Intervention

Educational session aimed at caregivers: A one-hour, standardized educational session, conducted by a nurse in small groups of 15 caregivers will have the following content:

• Nutritional value of food.

• Designing a healthy diet.

• Advice on dietary adaptation to address the most common nutritional problems in this group, such as energy, protein, vitamin, mineral and water deficiency, and adaptation of textures.

• Recommendations on basic cooking techniques.

Monitoring of educational intervention: PCC nurses will monitor patients monthly at home up to 6 months and then at 12 months.

To provide individualized dietary advice as necessary, standardized ad hoc cards have been developed with all the predictable interventions.

Controls: Control subjects will not receive nutritional intervention; they will be visited once to complete an initial assessment and will receive regular Home Care follow-up at 6 months and 12 months.

Training

Four 2-hour sessions will be held to standardize the procedure for nurses. Briefings are intended to standardize the procedure and train the nurses of the different PCC participants.

Content of the first briefing includes:

• Presentation of the study.

• Data collection procedures: MNA, Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), Barthel, Yesavage and Pfeiffer questionnaires.

The second session will focus on the educational intervention:

• Reminder of the general concepts of nutrition and food in nutritional risk situations.

• Methodology for nutrition education aimed at the elderly dependent’s caregiver.

The third session will be aimed to train nurses for dietary assessment and detection of critical points. The objectives to achieve during the month will be set from these critical points.

The fourth session will have the following content:

• Standardization of education for caregivers.

• Creation of educational material.

• Procedures.

These sessions will be conducted by expert nutrition researchers with experience in educating health professionals.

Outcomes Assessment

Subject variables in the intervention and non-intervention groups: These variables will be collected at baseline and except sociodemographic variables and current medical history again at 6 months (end of intervention), and 12 months. For the intervention group there is a questionnaire on adherence to the diet.

Primary outcomes measures

Nutritional status variables: Key variable: MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment) is a validated test with sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of malnutrition [12]. MNA has been selected as the main variable because it is the most used tool in PHC.

Other variables

Anthropometric measurements

Determination of standing height: Height will be measured at the highest point of the head, barefoot, with knees together, not bent, feet together, head up and eyes forward.

Calculation of length at knee-to-heel height (in the case of bedridden persons): With the person supine, flex the knee to an angle of 90. The measure will require 2 people: one will fix solid references at level of heel and knee, and the other will measure it with a tape measure. To estimate height, the formula of Chumlea will be used [24]:

<a onClick="popup('http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/373/mathml/M1','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/373/mathml/M1">View MathML</a>

Determination of body weight: Portable scale. Subject will be standing in light clothes and barefoot, with the patient at the center of the scale.

Determination of body weight when it cannot be measured: the following formula will be applied:

<a onClick="popup('http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/373/mathml/M2','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/373/mathml/M2">View MathML</a>

Middle-Upper Arm circumference (MUAC): we will use the midpoint of the arm. With arm relaxed and parallel to the body, we will determine the circumference at this point with tape, without tightening the tape [14].

Calf circumference (CC): we will follow similar instructions.

Daily consumption of food Food frequency questionnaire (FFQ): Knowledge of the dietary intake of individuals is a fundamental tool to assess the risk of disease. This test is validated for the population of Reus and gives information on food intake, energy, and micronutrients [25].

Biochemical markers The biochemical parameters to be analyzed are:

• Serum albumin and prealbumin (chemiluminescence).

• Serum transferrin (immunoturbidimetric).

• Hemoglobin, hematocrit, lymphocyte count (Coulter).

• Serum iron (colorimetric using ferrozine as chromatogenous agent).

A unique study profile will be created to analyze all these parameters in the Tarraco laboratory (ISO 9001:2000 certified ICS Tarragona laboratory). The extraction will be done in patient homes by PHC nurses. The same professional will take it to the PCC in regular temperature conditions, using the standard sample transport procedure between PHC and the central laboratory. The samples will be stored 8 days, the usual period of storage in the laboratory, and the results will be sent to the PHC within 8 days.

Secondary outcome measures

Sociodemographic variables

Age and sex will be recorded and social risk will be assessed through assessment of the family socio-scale designed and validated by Primary Health Care of Gijón [26].

Current medical history

Chronic diseases registered (e-cap), type of teeth (natural or dentures, and if prosthesis, good or bad fit).

Degree of dependency

Barthel Test or Basic Activities of Daily Living (ADL), used to make a physical functional assessment of patients. The collection is done by direct observation or by asking the patient if possible. The total score is calculated by adding the score of each activity. A higher score indicates greater independence: High dependence (<30), moderate dependence (30–60) and mild dependence (60–90) [27].

Cognitive function

Assessment of cognitive impairment by Pfeiffer’s test, a validated screening questionnaire of cognitive impairment, is fast and allows corrections depending on the subject’s level of education [28].

Mood

Rating mood of the population 65 years old and over by Yesavage Depression Scale identifies the presence of depression and sets levels. It consists of a series of questions with the responses scored as 0 or 1 point. A 5-item version will be used in this study. Scores are classified as 0–1, no depression; ≥ 2, possible depression [29].

Caregiver variables in the intervention and non-intervention groups

These variables will be collected at baseline for both groups, except for the assessment of knowledge acquisition, which will be collected in the intervention group before the intervention, immediately after, and at 1–6–12 months thereafter.

Secondary outcome measures

Sociodemographic data

Age, sex, socioeconomic status, education, and the patient’s connections (family, volunteers, employee).

Knowledge acquisition

An 11-item questionnaire on basic concepts explained in the nutritional education intervention, designed by researchers.

Statistical analysis

Sample size

The main variable is the MNA score. This value has an approximate average of 25.4 and standard deviation of 3.7 points in the Spanish population [15]. It is considered that variation of 2 points is a clinically relevant value. Considering a one-sided hypothesis and admitting an alpha error of 0.05 and a power of 95%, a sample of 72 subjects in each group is needed to observe a difference of 2 points in the MNA test after educational intervention with a precision of 80%. Taking into account possible losses during follow-up, the sample expands by 20% (15 subjects) so that the study includes 87 subjects in each group, a total of approximately 200 patients.

Analysis strategy

Variables will be described as mean and standard deviation and percentages for quantitative and qualitative variables respectively. Comparison of quantitative variables will use Student-Fisher T test and analysis of variance for categorical variables and the chi-square statistical test. Standard tests (Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilks) will be used to verify the hypothesis of normal distribution of quantitative variables. If the preconditions for the application of statistical tests are fulfilled non-parametric tests will be used.

Longitudinal studies with a control group, which act in a phased manner on the caregiver-patient to see the effect on the patient, have different directions of analysis: caregiver assessment to measure acquisition of knowledge and implementation of dietary advice, and patient assessment to measure the effectiveness of educational intervention on nutritional status (MNA, diet, anthropometry, biochemistry) at 6 and 12 months in the intervention and control group and between groups.

To evaluate these effects, multivariate models of multiple linear regression and logistic regression will be created.

To measure the effect of educational intervention on the patient’s nutritional status (MNA, diet, anthropometry, biochemistry), the results will be adjusted according to degree of knowledge acquisition and implementation of dietary advice, as well as other variables that may interfere with the patient’s nutritional status such as socio-economic characteristics, caregiver education levels, and patients’ chronic diseases, dental status, degree of dependence (Barthel test), cognitive function (Pfeiffer Test), or mood (Yesavage Scale).

Initially the inclusion in the model of all variables that are part of the theoretical model will be forced, and in a second phase there will be an automatic selection by the stepwise method (backward and forward) to get reduced models.

The conditions of application of the models will be verified by standard techniques that are primarily based on analysis of the residuals.

The bilateral null hypothesis of normality, no difference and no significance of regression coefficients, will be discarded when their probability is less than 5%.

For data analysis the latest version of the software package SPSS/PC for Windows will be used.

Ethical Approval

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Primary Care Research (IDIAP) Jordi Gol on April 27, 2009.

Discussion

Conducting a randomized intervention study allows us to compare the effect of an educational intervention about nutritional aspects between two groups, intervention and control, and random geographic location of the subjects avoids bias.

Inclusion of the PCCs of our area is randomized and stratified representing different geographical areas according to various categories: rural, urban, city center and suburb. The inclusion in the study of all patients in the Home Care program of the selected PCCs is impor-tant to avoid selection bias.

Educational intervention is aimed to caregivers because its efficacy in improving the health of dependent patients has been observed. Inclusion of the educational intervention in a Home Care Program already being carried out by nurses facilitates the conduct of the study and guarantees continuity if positive results are obtained.

The same assessment methodology will be used for the intervention and non-intervention groups and different nurses will conduct the groups to avoid influence between groups in the majority of the centers, except in the smallest centers where the same nurse will necessarily conduct both groups.

Education will be standardized among the nurses and will use the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) methodology specific to the nursing profession. Nursing diagnosis is the clinical judgment about an individual response to life processes, including real or potential health problems, and provides the basis for the choice of nursing intervention in order to reach the goals or outcomes. These results should be formulated before identifying and performing interventions, which are those actions that are aimed at helping the patient to achieve the expected results based on knowledge and clinical judgment [30].

Inclusion of NANDA methodology will improve the effect of early education of caregivers because it continues nutritional counselling in a direct and personalized way, nurses will use their own professional methodology, and this one is internationally accepted.

Study results will be obtained for the main variable MNA test, a validated screening test with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 90% [14], and also using other outcomes measures like anthropometric measurements (estimated according to standard recommendations), a validated food frequency questionnaire, and biochemical markers. Standard laboratory methodology will be followed for extraction, transport, treatment and storage of the samples, which will be frozen for simultaneous analysis to avoid analytical variability.

Losses to follow-up are a limitation of longitudinal studies. Moreover, in dependent patients, the loss is very high due to their serious health condition. The 20% increase over the minimum required sample and the effect at 6 months will be calculated for intermediate reporting in the case of subjects lost to follow-up.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Authors' contribution

All authors provided comment, read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Study concept and design: VA, NM, TC, CA, AIC, MGB, AGC, AIGB, CL, TM. Conducted research: VA, NM, TCA, RP, WB, JB, Coordinators for data collection: VA, NM, TC. Aquisition of data: TC, CA, AIC, MGB, AGC, AIGB, CL, TM. Planning of statistical analysis, database design: VA, NM, SFB: Drafting of the manuscript and primary responsibility for final content: VA, SFB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by two grants, from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Madrid, Spain (PI09/90340) and from the Generalitat de Catalunya, Agència d’Informació, Avaluació i Qualitat en Salut, Barcelona, Spain (315/03/08).

References

  1. Bauer JM, Kaiser MJ, Anthony P, Guigoz Y, Sieber CC: The Mini Nutritional Assessment–its history, today's practice, and future perspectives.

    Nutr Clin Pract 2008, 23(4):388-396. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Phillips MB, Foley AL, Barnard R, Isenring EA, Miller MD: Nutritional screening in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic literature review.

    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2010, 19(3):440-449. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  3. Salminen H, Sääf M, Johansson SE, Ringertz H, Strender LE: Nutritional status, as determined by the Mini-Nutritional Assessment, and osteoporosis: a cross-sectional study of an elderly female population.

    Eur J Clin Nutr 2006, 60:486-493. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Garcia Peris P: Prevalencia y factores asociados a malnutrición en ancianos hospitalizados.

    An Med Interna 2004, 21:261-262. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  5. Jiménez Sanz M, Sola Villafranca JM, Perez Ruiz C, Turienzo Llata MJ, Larranaga Lavin G, Mancebo Santamaria MA, Hernández Barranco MC, García Iglesias A, Palacio Pellón JL, Pelillo García T, Fernández Del Moral Pinilla S, Sañudo Pedrero RA, Gutiérrez García L, Castro Ugalde P, García Calderón MI, Cagigas Villoslada MJ, Del Río Pelaz MR, Besoy González AI, Canduela Fontanela B, Castañeda García E, De Cos Iglesia A, De Cos Seco MJ, Domínguez Salas R, García Mata MA, González Gutiérrez T, Alonso Díez P, Barriga Gómez P, Biurrun Ruiz I, Blanco Martínez O, Cadaya Gabas N: Study of the nutritional status of elders in Cantabria.

    Nutr Hosp 2011, 26:345-354. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Young K, Bunn F, Trivedi D, Dickinson A: Nutritional education for community dwelling older people: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

    Int J Nurs Stud 2011, 48:751-780. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Zabalegui A, Escobar MA, Cabrera E, Gual MP, Fortuny M, Mach G, Ginesti M, Narbona P: Análisis del programa educativo PECA para mejorar la calidad de vida de las personas mayores.

    Aten Primaria 2006, 37:260-265. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. García Castillo N, Pérez Fonollá MD: Implantación de un programa de apoyo al cuidador del anciano dependiente hospitalizado.

    Nure Investigación 2005, 17:1-15. OpenURL

  9. Suominen MH, Kivisto SM, Pitkala KH: The effects of nutrition education on professionals' practice and on the nutrition of aged residents in dementia wards.

    Eur J Clin Nutr 2007, 61:1226-1232. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Riviere S, Gillete-Guyonnet S, Voisin T, Reynish E, Andrieu S, Lauque S, Salva A, Frisoni G, Nourhashemi F, Micas M, Vellas B: A nutritional education program could prevent weight loss and slow cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease.

    J Nutr Health Aging 2001, 5(4):295-299. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  11. A'Campo LE, Spliethoff-Kamminga NG, Macht M, EduPark Consortium, Roos RA: Caregiver education in Parkinson's disease: formative evaluation of a standardized program in seven European countries.

    Qual Life Res 2010, 19(1)):55-64. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  12. Guigoz Y, Vellas BJ, Garry PJ: Assessing the nutritional status of the elderly. The Mini Nutritional Asssessment as part of the geriatric evaluation.

    Nutr Rev 1996, 54:59-65. OpenURL

  13. Izaola O, de Luis Román DA, Cabezas G, Rojo S, Cuellar L, Terroba MC, Aller R, González Sagrado M: Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) test as a tool of nutritional evaluation in hospitalized patients.

    An Med Interna 2005, 22:313-316. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  14. Cuervo M, García A, Ansorena D, Sánchez-Villegas A, Martínez-González M, Astiasarán I, Martínez J: Nutritional assessment interpretation on 22,007 Spanish community-dwelling elders through the Mini Nutritional Assessment test.

    Public Health Nutr 2009, 12:82-90. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Harris DG, Davies C, Ward H, Haboubi NY: An observational study of screening for malnutrition in elderly people living in sheltered accommodation.

    J Hum Nutr Diet 2008, 21:3-9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Cereda E, Pusani C, Limonta D, Vanotti A: The ability of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index to assess the nutritional status and predict the outcome of home-care resident elderly: a comparison with the Mini Nutritional Assessment.

    Br J Nutr 2009, 10:1-8. OpenURL

  17. Segura JM, Bastida N, Martí N, Riba M: The ATDOM programme in Raval Nord: descriptive analysis of 10 years of primary care.

    Aten Primaria 2004, 33:215-217. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Unanque-Urquijo S, Badia-Capdevila H, Rodríguez-Requejo S, Sánchez-Pérez I, Coderch- Lassaletta J: Factores asociados al estado nutricional de pacientes geriátricos institucionalizados y atendidos en su domicilio.

    Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2009, 44:38-41. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  19. Cuervo M, Ansorena D, García A, Astiasarán I, Martínez JA: Food consumption analysis in spanish elderly based upon the mini nutritional assessment test.

    Ann Nutr Metab 2008, 52:299-307. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Mbodj EB, Ngom PI, Seck MT, Aïdara AW, Ndiaye C, Dieng L, Touré SN, Faye D, Diallo PD: Relationships between masticatory performance and nutritional state in complete denture wearers.

    Odontostomatol Trop 2008, 31:20-26. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  21. Cabrera MA, Mesas AE, Garcia AR, de Andrade SM: Malnutrition and depression among community-dwelling elderly people.

    J Am Med Dir Assoc 2007, 8(9):582-584. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Zekry D, Herrmann FR, Grandjean R, Meynet MP, Michel JP, Gold G, Krause KH: Demented versus non-demented very old inpatients: the same comorbidities but poorer functional and nutritional status.

    Age Ageing 2008, 37:83-89. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  23. Thompson P, Lang L, Annells M: A systematic review of the effectiveness of in-home community nurse led interventions for the mental health of older persons.

    J Clin Nurs 2008, 17:1419-1427. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  24. Chumlea WC, Roche AF, Steinbaugh ML: Estimating stature from knee height for persons 60 to 90 years of age.

    J Am Geriatr Soc 1985, 33:116-119. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  25. Trinidad Rodriguez I, Fernández Ballart J, Cucó Pastor G, Biarnés Jordà E, Arija Val V: Validación de un cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo alimentario corto: reproducibilidad y validez.

    Nutr Hosp 2008, 23:242-252. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  26. Cabrera González D, Menéndez Caicoya A, Fernández Sánchez A, Acebal García V, García González JV, Díaz Palacios E, Salamea García A: Evaluación de la fiabilidad y validez de una escala de valoración social en el anciano.

    Aten Primaria 1999, 23:434-40. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  27. Mahoney FI, Barthel D: Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index.

    Md State Med J 1965, 14:56-61. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  28. de la Iglesia JM Martínez, Dueñas Herrero R, Onís Vilches MC, Aguado Taberné C, Albert Colomer C, Luque Luque R: Adaptación y Validación al Castellano del Cuestionario de Pfeiffer (SPMSQ) para Detectar la Existencia de Deterioro Cognitivo en Personas Mayores de 65 Años.

    Medicina Clínica 2001, 117:129-134. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  29. De Dios Del Valle R, Hernández Sánchez AM, Rexach Cano LI, Cruz Jentoft AJ: Validación de una versión de cinco ítems de la Escala de Depresión Geriátrica de Yesavage en población española.

    Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2001, 36(5)):276-280. OpenURL

  30. Johnson M, Bulechek GM, Butcher H, Maas ML, McCloskey Dochterman J, Moorhead S: Interrelaciones NANDA, NIC y NOC. In Diagnósticos enfermeros, resultados e intervenciones. 2nd edition. Elsevier, Madrid; 2006. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/373/prepub