|Standardized T -scores of attitude (pros, cons), social influence (modeling, support) and self-efficacy (social, emotional, routine) in the stage groups|
|PC; n = 58||CP; n = 39||AM; n = 73||LSD contrasts|
|Pros||49.76||52.50||48.09||PC, CP; PC, AM; CP > AM|
|Cons||49.73||51.14||49.32||PC, CP, AM|
|Social modeling||46.69||48.66||52.97||PC, CP < AM|
|Social support||47.49||52.45||51.09||PC < CP, AM|
|Social self-efficacy||48.83||44.03||54.14||PC > CP < AM; PC < AM|
|Emotional self-efficacy||50.09||42.05||54.05||PC > CP < AM; PC < AM|
|Routine self-efficacy||49.70||44.15||53.45||PC > CP < AM; PC < AM|
Note. PC = precontemplation; CP = contemplation/preparation; AM = action/maintenance.
CP < AM: the mean score of CP is significantly lower than that of AM.
PC, CP, AM: the mean scores of PC, CP and AM are equal.
Schulz et al.
Schulz et al. BMC Public Health 2012 12:360 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-360