Open Access Research article

Contraception matters: indicators of poor usage of contraception in sexually active women attending family planning clinics in Victoria, Australia

Jason Ong1*, Meredith Temple-Smith2, William CW Wong3, Kathleen McNamee4 and Christopher Fairley5

Author affiliations

1 Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

2 General Practice and Primary Health Care Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

3 Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong

4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Family Planning Victoria. Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia

5 Melbourne Sexual Health Centre. School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

For all author emails, please log on.

Citation and License

BMC Public Health 2012, 12:1108  doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-1108

Published: 23 December 2012

Abstract

Background

Unintended pregnancy (mistimed or unwanted) remains an important health issue for women. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with risk of unintended pregnancy in a sample of Victorian women attending family planning clinics.

Methods

This cross-sectional survey of three Family Planning Victoria Clinics from April to July 2011 recruited women aged 16-50 years with a male sexual partner in the last 3 months, and not intending to conceive. The questionnaire asked about contraceptive behaviours and important factors that influence contraception use (identified from a systematic literature review). Univariate analysis was calculated for the variables of interest for associations with contraceptive use. An overall multivariate model for being at risk for unintended pregnancy (due to inconsistent or ineffective contraceptive use or non-use) was calculated through backward elimination with statistical significance set at <0.05.

Results

1006 surveys were analyzed with 96% of women reporting contraception use in the last 3 months. 37% of women were at risk for unintended pregnancy due to imperfect use (61% inconsistent users; 31% ineffective methods) or never using contraception (8%). On multivariate analysis, women at risk for unintended pregnancy compared with women not at risk were <25 years old (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7); had no university/postgraduate degree (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.4); and had >1 partner in the last 3 months (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.3-4.6). These women were dissatisfied with current contraception (OR 2.5, 95% 1.8-3.5); felt “vulnerable” to pregnancy (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.6-3.0); were not confident in contraceptive knowledge (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.8); were unable to stop to use contraception when aroused (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5-2.9) but were comfortable in speaking to a doctor about contraception (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.1).

Conclusion

Despite reported high contraceptive usage, nearly 40% of women were at risk for unintended pregnancy primarily due to inconsistent contraceptive use and use of ineffective contraception. Strategies for improving consistency of effective contraception use or greater emphasis on long-acting contraception may be needed for certain subpopulations at higher risk for unintended pregnancy.

Keywords:
Contraception; Family Planning; Women’s health; Unintended pregnancy; Unplanned pregnancy