Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
10 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Byass |
7 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janneke Cox |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
10 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Takele Tadesse |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
10 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Takele Tadesse |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
10 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Takele Tadesse |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
10 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
15 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janneke Cox |
5 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Takele Tadesse |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
5 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
5 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Takele Tadesse |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
5 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
5 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Takele Tadesse |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
5 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
5 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Takele Tadesse |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
5 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
26 Nov 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1039 |
You can find further information about peer review here.