Table 3

Associations between sex with paid and non-paid female partner and exposure to the program, IBBA Round-2 on National Highways

Exposure to HIV prevention program


% not exposed

% exposed to less intensive program

% exposed to intensive program


All Routes

Had sex with PFP in last 12 months***

No (N= 1578)

Yes (N = 507)

50.6

26.5

24.2

29.5

25.2

44.0

Had sex with NPFP in last 12 months

No (N= 1618)

Yes (N = 467)

44.7

46.0

24.7

28.5

30.6

25.5

North-East

Had sex with PFP in last 12 months ***

No (N= 387)

Yes (N = 137)

56.1

28.2

22.1

26.0

21.8

45.8

Had sex with NPFP in last 12 months

No (N= 387)

Yes (N = 137)

50.0

45.4

22.6

24.7

27.4

29.9

North-South

Had sex with PFP in last 12 months

No (N= 390)

Yes (N = 148)

43.5

41.0

18.7

20.3

37.8

38.7

Had sex with NPFP in last 12 months

No (N= 443)

Yes (N = 95)

42.1

45.7

17.6

26.7

40.2

27.3

North-West

Had sex with PFP in last 12 months**

No (N= 369)

Yes (N = 157)

39.8

27.9

26.7

16.9

33.2

55.2

Had sex with NPFP in last 12 months**

No (N= 356)

Yes (N = 170)

42.7

24.2

17.9

36.1

39.4

39.7

South-East

Had sex with PFP in last 12 months

No (N= 432)

Yes (N = 65)

63.9

55.6

27.8

26.9

8.4

17.5

Had sex with NPFP in last 12 months

No (N= 432)

Yes (N = 65)

67.7

61.8

30.0

27.2

2.2

10.9


** P< 0.05; *** P <0.01

Differences between the categories were tested by using Chi-square test.

PFP: Paid female partner; NPFP: Non-paid female partner

Pandey et al. BMC Public Health 2011 11(Suppl 6):S15   doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-S6-S15

Open Data