Table 2

Results of logistic regression analysis for the outcome perceived poor sleep quality

Poor perceived sleep quality


Model

Commuting mode

Commuting time (min)

Resp.1 (n)

Prev.2 (%)

OR

95% C.I. Low

95% C.I. High


Unadjusted

Active

< 30

4376

11

1.00


Car

< 30

10755

11

1.09

0.97

1.22


Car

30-60

2280

13

1.30

1.12

1.52


Car

> 60

449

10

0.94

0.68

1.30


Public

< 30

1332

10

0.96

0.78

1.18


Public

30-60

1312

13

1.27

1.05

1.53


Public

> 60

584

15

1.55

1.21

1.97


Partly adjusted

Active

< 30

1.00


Car

< 30

1.09

0.97

1.22


Car

30-60

1.37

1.17

1.61


Car

> 60

1.05

0.76

1.46


Public

< 30

0.91

0.74

1.11


Public

30-60

1.24

1.03

1.50


Public

> 60

1.53

1.19

1.96


Fully adjusted

Active

< 30

1.00


Car

< 30

1.05

0.93

1.19


Car

30-60

1.37

1.16

1.62


Car

> 60

1.02

0.72

1.45


Public

< 30

0.85

0.69

1.05


Public

30-60

1.17

0.95

1.43


Public

> 60

1.41

1.08

1.85


1. Respondents; 2. Prevalence; Partly adjusted: Adjusted for the covariates sex, age, education, place of birth and occupational class; Fully adjusted: Adjusted for the covariates sex, age, education, place of birth, occupational class, job strain, overtime, history of unemployment, income, financial stress, residential location and family situation.

Hansson et al. BMC Public Health 2011 11:834   doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-834

Open Data