Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Francesco Chini |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
8 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Francesco Chini |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
26 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronald Cossman |
30 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marc Saez |
6 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lisa Lix |
13 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Francesco Chini |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
13 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
22 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marc Saez |
25 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronald Cossman |
1 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lisa Lix |
11 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Francesco Chini |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
5 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-688 |
You can find further information about peer review here.