Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
30 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lucas Wiessing |
22 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christer Lidman |
19 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Removille |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
19 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
1 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Removille |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
1 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
1 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Removille |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
1 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
1 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Removille |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
1 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
25 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christer Lidman |
28 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Removille |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
28 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
10 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathalie Removille |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
10 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 11 |
Publishing | ||
19 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
19 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-351 |
You can find further information about peer review here.