Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 25 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tomas Aragon |
| 28 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Stoto |
| 19 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Eisenman |
| 28 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Debra Revere |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 28 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 1 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Debra Revere |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 1 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 22 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Stoto |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
| 15 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Debra Revere |
| Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
| 15 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
| Publishing | ||
| 18 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 18 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-337 |
You can find further information about peer review here.