Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Public Health and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Evaluation of a school-based HIV prevention intervention among Yemeni adolescents

Buthaina Al-Iryani12*, Huda Basaleem3, Khaled Al-Sakkaf3, Rik Crutzen1, Gerjo Kok4 and Bart van den Borne1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Health Promotion, Faculty of Medicine, Health, and Life-Sciences, Maastricht University, the Netherlands

2 United Nations Children's Fund, Sana'a, Yemen

3 Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Aden University, Republic of Yemen

4 Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Maastricht University, the Netherlands

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Public Health 2011, 11:279  doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-279

Published: 7 May 2011

Abstract

Background

This article describes an evaluation of a school-based peer education intervention for HIV prevention among students in twenty seven high schools in Aden, Yemen. The intervention was developed after a survey among the same population in 2005, which revealed a high level of stigma towards people living with HIV (PLWH) and a low level of HIV knowledge.

Methods

In a quasi-experimental design students who received the peer education intervention (78.6%) were compared with students who did not receive the intervention (21.4%). No systematic procedure was applied in selecting students for the intervention condition. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire from a sample of 2510 students from all 27 high-schools in Aden governorate. To increase internal validity, students were also compared with a cohort control sample surveyed in 2005, which was a random sample of 2274 students from the same schools.

Results

Sixty eight percent of students targeted by peer education had good knowledge scores, compared with 43.3% of students not targeted by peer education (χ2 = (df = 1) = 111.15, p < .01). Multi-level regression analysis revealed that, although there was a significant difference among schools, the intervention effect of peer education at the individual level was significant; students who received peer education had a statistically higher knowledge score(9.24 out of 12.0) compared with those not targeted (7.89 out of 12.0), OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.04-4.27, p < .05). Compared with the 2005 cohort control sample, students targeted by peer education had better knowledge on the modes of transmission and prevention and fewer misconceptions; and knowledge on the use of condoms increased from 49.4% to 67.8%. In addition, students who received the peer education interventions suggested significantly more actions to provide care and support for PLWH. Also, the levels of stigma and discrimination were much higher among the 2005 cohort control group, compared with those who received the peer education intervention.

Conclusion

The school-based peer education intervention has succeeded in improving levels of knowledge on modes of transmission and prevention, and in decreasing levels of stigma and discrimination in a culturally conservative setting.