Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Public Health and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Missed opportunities in TB diagnosis: a TB Process-Based Performance Review tool to evaluate and improve clinical care

Nigel Field1*, Jill Murray2, Michelle L Wong3, Rob Dowdeswell4, Ntomboxolo Dudumayo5, Lesego Rametsi4, Neil Martinson67, Marc Lipman8, Judith R Glynn9 and Pam Sonnenberg1

Author Affiliations

1 Centre for Sexual Health & HIV Research, Research Department of Infection & population Health, University College London, London, UK

2 National Institute for Occupational Health, National Health Laboratory Service, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

3 Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa

4 Rustenburg Platinum Mines, Anglo Platinum, Rustenburg, South Africa

5 Lonmin PLC, Rustenburg, South Africa

6 Perinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

7 Johns Hopkins University Center for TB Research, Baltimore, USA

8 Respiratory Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK

9 Infectious Disease Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Public Health 2011, 11:127  doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-127

Published: 22 February 2011

Abstract

Background

Traditional tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcome measures, such as cure rate, do not provide insight into the underlying reasons for missing clinical targets. We evaluated a TB Process-Based Performance Review (TB-PBPR) tool, developed to identify "missed opportunities" for timely and accurate diagnosis of TB. The tool enables performance assessment at the level of process and quality of care.

Methods

The TB-PBPR tool is a single-page structured flow-sheet that identifies 14 clinical actions (grouped into elicited symptoms, clinical examination and investigations). Medical records from selected deceased patients were reviewed at two South African mine hospitals (A = 56 cases; B = 26 cases), a South African teaching hospital (C = 20 cases) and a UK teaching hospital (D = 13 cases).

Results

In hospital A, where autopsy was routine, TB was missed in life in 52% (23/44) of cases and was wrongly attributed as the cause of death in 16% (18/110). Clinical omissions were identified at each hospital and at every stage of clinical management. For example, recording of chest symptoms was omitted in up to 39% of cases, sputum smear examination in up to 85% and chest radiograph in up to 38% of cases respectively.

Conclusions

This study introduces the TB-PBPR tool as a novel method to review and evaluate clinical performance in TB management. We found that simple clinical actions were omitted in many cases. The tool, in conjunction with a manual describing best practice, is adaptable to a range of settings, is educational and enables detailed feedback within a TB programme. The TB-PBPR tool and manual are both freely available for general use.